Author Interview – Nigel Blackwell

Today I’m interviewing author Nigel Blackwell, a fellow member of one of the writing critique groups I’m in.

Nigel Blackwell was born in rural Oxfordshire in England. He has a love of books, a PhD in Physical Chemistry, and a black belt in pointing out the obvious. He is presently working on both short stories with supernatural and mystical elements, and thrillers. By The Light is the first book in this range. In the past he authored Paris Love Match, the story of what happens when an engineer encounters the mob, a bag of diamonds, and a girl to die for— and finds that’s exactly what might happen if he doesn’t think fast.

Collaborating with New York Times best selling author Diane Capri, he wrote the Jessica Kimball series of thrillers. Jess is an investigative reporter with an uncanny gift for putting herself in mortal danger when justice needs to be served. Nigel has driven trains, crashed single seat race cars, and travelled much of the world. He now lives in Texas with his wife and daughter, where they enjoy the sunshine and listen to the coyotes howl at night.

And now, the interview:

Poseidon’s Scribe: How did you get started writing? What prompted you? 

Nigel Blackwell: I‘ve loved reading and stories since elementary school, and writing seemed an obvious thing to do, but I didn’t start on full length novels until about ten years ago.

P.S.: Who are some of your influences? What are a few of your favorite books? 

N.B.: Wow. Where do I start? In (what Americans would call) middle school, we used to have to read classics such as Sheridan, Shakespeare, and Chaucer (but sadly not the “Wife of Bath’s tale!”). I can’t say I hated them, but at the time HG Wells, AC Clarke, Aldous Huxley, Isaac Asimov and almost anyone else was more interesting. Weirdly, when I read back over my own writing, I think the stiff style of the former set have influenced me as much as the latter.

These days, I’ve added many more influences. Lee Child for the way he’s made a brilliant series that doesn’t feel like soap opera; Michael Crichton for his variety; Greg Bear for his science; F Paul Wilson for his mix of realism with the supernatural, and … well, it’s a big list.

As for books, The Affair by Lee Child is a standout in both style and story, Rendezvous with Rama because of its mystery and portent (Raman’s do everything in threes …), and Pirate Latitudes because (published after Crichton passing) it is a fitting end to a fabulous storytelling career.

P.S.: Is there a common attribute that ties your fiction together (genre, character types, settings, themes) or are you a more eclectic author?

N.B.: Ha, if eclectic is the polite way to say all over the place, then yes, with thrillers, capers, mysteries, and verse, I’m eclectic! That said, what I try for in all my work is close POV with conflict on multiple levels.

P.S.: You’ve collaborated with author Diane Capri on several books in the Jess Kimball thriller series. What was it like to collaborate? How did you split up the work?

N.B.: Diane’s a full-time author. She works very hard on all aspects of the business from concepts and writing to marketing and promotion. That focus certainly helped my productivity! We tried various approaches to collaborating, interleaving chapters for example, but they made for more work. So we settled on a quick first draft which we would cycle back and forth editing. It was a great time, and I’m proud to have worked on the series.

P.S.: You’ve written novels, novellas, short stories, and poems. Do you have a preference among those forms?

N.B.: I prefer to write novels, they give time to explore the characters’ lives and situations. But short stories and verse are good in two respects, they help you focus on what’s essential to tell the story (no getting sidetracked into bunny trails), and they take a month not a year 🙂

P.S.: If you could win a trip to the fictional world of another author, where would you go and what would you do there?

N.B.: As a teen, I wanted to be in Clarke’s 2001—grown up and heading to Jupiter. Now I’m grown up I want to be a teen at Hogwarts. But that’s the great thing about books, they give us the chance to live vicariously. You can travel in time and space meeting new people in faraway places—all at the turn of a page!

P.S.: Your most recent book is By the Light, a collection of novellas, short stories, and poems. Please tell us about it. Is there a common theme?

N.B.: After a string of Jess Kimble thrillers, it was great to write self-contained pieces on different subjects. Most have a touch of the supernatural to them, and a number have an element of ambiguity until the end. For example, the captain (a typically male occupation) in “Sisters” is never said to be female, but for a cryptic comment (“… of no comfort to man. Nor me.”).

P.S.: What are the easiest, and the most difficult, aspects of writing for you?

N.B.: Easiest is the first draft, most difficult is the last. Sadly, that’s more than just humor. It’s easy to come up with ideas, but filling in all the details is hard work. But it’s satisfying when things come together in a scene, and that makes it all worthwhile.

P.S.: If you traveled through time and met yourself at a point when you were first thinking of being a writer, what would you tell this younger version of you?

N.B.: Know the ending before you start.

A book takes readers on a journey. If you simply take left- and right-hand turns hoping to end up somewhere interesting, you might, but most times you won’t. On the other hand, if you decide you’re going to Niagara Falls you can plot the most interesting way to get there. That way the reader feels like the draw of each step inevitably leads to the right conclusion.

P.S.: What is your current work in progress? Would you mind telling us a little about it?

N.B.: I’m closing in on the end of The Devil’s Bible. In WW1, a British mathematician is sent to retrieve a document from occupied France. He finds the document is one of a series of scrolls spread across Europe that will bestow demonic powers. Chasing after them, he discovers a German General is also in the hunt … and the General has a whole army behind him.

Poseidon’s Scribe: What advice can you offer aspiring writers?

Nigel Blackwell: The typical response would be to stop aspiring and write. I’d also say, see question 9 😉

Less flippantly, watching movies is a quick way to pick up story ideas, characters, and locations. But most important is to read. When I started writing novels, I felt reading was a luxury that took me away from the work. But really it’s education, inspiration, and encouragement all rolled into one—mysteries are solved, justice is done, and heroes and heroines save the day. Stories are all about playing with the readers emotions, and is there any better feeling to help put pen to paper?

Thank you, Nigel.

Readers can keep up with Nigel at his website, and on Facebook, Amazon, and Goodreads.

Stories from the Grand Hotel

If you’d love to write a story, are unsure what to write about, and you think every possible story has already been written, don’t worry. So long as you don’t plagiarize, there’s room in the world for your story.

It may seem like writers before you already used every possible plot, character type, setting, theme, mood, and style. Maybe they have, but not in the combination you’ll use. None of the previous authors brought the distinct flair to their stories that you’ll bring to yours.

What does this have to do with the ‘grand hotel’ mentioned in this post’s subject? Everything.

In 1924, German mathematician David Hilbert introduced what’s come to be known as the ‘paradox of the Grand Hotel.’ Imagine a big hotel, so big it contains an infinite number of rooms. You arrive at the front desk and ask if you can have a room for the night. The receptionist says the hotel is full, with every room occupied, but there are vacancies.

That makes no sense, but the receptionist picks up the public address microphone and directs all guests to move from their current room to the next higher numbered room. The receptionist then offers you Room number 1. Problem solved.

You enjoy your stay there. The next time you’re in town, you go to that hotel again. You forget to get a reservation ahead of time (again), and this time you’re accompanied by an infinite number of friends who all want separate rooms.

The receptionist again says the hotel is full, but also says there’s no problem accommodating you and your friends. Over the PA system, the receptionist instructs all current guests to move from their room to the one with a number two times their current room number. The receptionist then checks you and your many friends into the odd-numbered rooms.

You get where I’m going with this. We live in a world filled with an infinite number of stories, and they’ve all been written before. Even so, there’s room for yours. Since it will bear similarities to previous stories, lawyers would call it derivative. Don’t copy character names or significant sections of text from previously published work—lawyers call that copyright infringement. Stay clear of plagiarizing, and the possibilities still go on without end.

In fact, even if your brain teems with an infinite number of story ideas, you can write them all (well, as many as a human lifespan allows). The world can accommodate an infinite number of writers, each writing an infinite number of stories.

Write as many stories as you can. There’s room for them all, as well as those written by—

Poseidon’s Scribe

Writer Me

In admiration of the brilliant Zillow commercial called “Susans,” here’s my take:

Photography Assistance by Sean Strange

Okay, listen up. Need ideas for the next story to write. Thoughts? Writer’s Block Me?

“I got nothin.”

Shouldn’t ever start with you. Daydreaming Me?

“Huh? Did you say something?”

Sheesh. Perfectionist Me?

“Working on the last story. It’s still not quite right.”

Never will be. Impatient Me?

“Just scribble something and submit it already.”

Right. Procrastinating Me?

“Can do. I’ll get back to you in…oh…a week from—”

Never mind. Distracted Me?

“Wow! Have you guys seen this video?”

Great. In-the-Zone Me?

“Can’t talk now.”

Sorry. How about…Editing Me?

“Who wrote this dreck? First-draft Me?”

First-draft Me: “Hey, none of you is perfect, but I’m first.”

Settle down, you two. Overcritical Me?

“Forget the whole idea. It’s stupid.”

Why even invite you? Creative Me?

“Loaded with fresh story ideas. Want ‘em alphabetically or by topic?”

Wonderful, but I need someone to do the writing… Prolific Me?

“I can work with Creative Me and knock out a story tonight. How’s that?”

Perfect. That’s why you two are my favorite me’s.

Sensitive Me (tearing up): “But…but I thought …”

Don’t cry. I’ll need you for character development. Let’s get on this. All together:

“Me! Me! Me! Me! Me—“

Poseidon’s Scribe (Me)

The Ray Bradbury Challenge

“Write a short story every week. It’s not possible to write 52 bad short stories in a row.” – Ray Bradbury

Bradbury said that in 2001 at The Sixth Annual Writer’s Symposium by the Sea, sponsored by Point Loma Nazarene University. Let’s call it the Ray Bradbury Challenge. (The first part, I mean, not the challenge to see how many bad short stories you can write in a row.)

Would you take that challenge? Could you write one short story every week for a year?

The challenge is part of the larger context of his talk. It’s worth watching the whole 55-minute video. His speech included great pieces of writing advice, and I’ll address those in a future post.

Bradbury thought it best for most beginning writers to start with short stories, rather than novels. (How I wish I’d done that when I started out!) He reasoned that the short story form trains you to focus on one idea, to compact your words. Moreover, every week you’ll complete a finished product, a tangible output.

It might seem a daunting challenge, but let’s break it down. Typical short stories run 1000 to 7500 words. That’s an average of 150 to 1100 words per day, though you’d more likely write a first draft at high speed and spend the rest of the week editing it.

By contrast, the NaNoWriMo challenge drives you to an intense burst of activity for one month (November), during which you must average almost 1700 words per day. Ideally, the end product is a 50,000-word novel, but in most cases, it’s an unpublishable one.

Bradbury’s challenge helps you form the daily habit of writing. It allows for—even expects—that you’ll enjoy concentrated, focused bouts of feverish, unconstrained flow, followed by periods of calm, dispassionate editing and revision to round out the week.

Moreover, his challenge grants frequent glows of happiness, satisfaction, accomplishment. Each week you affirm you’re a writer.

Think about the probabilities implied by his challenge. You’ll write no fewer than 1 good story out of 52. If you spent each year writing a novel instead, how long might it take before you wrote a good one?

Some might object that readers don’t read short stories, and publishers prefer novels. Perhaps, but you could do what Ray Bradbury did and publish themed collections of related short stories—so called ‘fixup novels,’ as he did with The Martian Chronicles, The Illustrated Man, and others.

Consider accepting Bradbury’s Challenge. You could write one short story a week for a year, couldn’t you? Even if 51 of those stories turn out to be terrible, you’ll have spent time learning the craft and discovering your voice. And you’ll have at least one good story to submit for publication.

I know, I know. You’re asking if I, Poseidon’s Scribe, am so willing to foist a challenge on others, would I be willing to accept it myself? Maybe I will set aside a year to do that sometime. Right now, I’m working on two novels. I’ve already written over eighty short stories, and had three dozen of them published. Though the writing took many years, I could claim I accomplished the Bradbury Challenge in slow motion.

If you do accept and complete the Bradbury Challenge, remember that all credit goes to the late Ray Bradbury, not to—

Poseidon’s Scribe

Author Interview—Scott Edelman

Today I have the honor of interviewing author, editor, and podcaster, Scott Edelman. He recently interviewed me on his unique podcast, Eating the Fantastic and we’re delighted he could visit our modest skyscraper at Poseidon’s Scribe Enterprises for an interview.

Scott Edelman has published over 100 short stories in magazines such as Analog, The Twilight Zone, Postscripts, Absolute Magnitude, Science Fiction Review and Fantasy Book, and in anthologies such as You, Human, The Solaris Book of New Science Fiction, Crossroads, MetaHorror, Once Upon a Galaxy, Moon Shots, Mars Probes, and Forbidden Planets. His poetry has appeared in Asimov’s, Amazing, Dreams and Nightmares, and others.

His recent short story collection is Things That Never Happened. Of that book, Publishers Weekly wrote: “His talent is undeniable.” Other collections include Tell Me What You Done Before (and Other Stories Written on the Shoulders of Giants), What Will Come After, and What We Still Talk About. He has been a Stoker Award finalist eight times, and What Will Come After was a finalist for the Shirley Jackson Award.

Additionally, Edelman worked as an editor for the Syfy Channel. Magazines he edited include Science Fiction Age, Sci-Fi Universe, Sci-Fi Flix, Satellite Orbit, and Rampage. He has been a four-time Hugo Award finalist for Best Editor.

He got his start editing at Marvel Comics, writing ad copy and editing the Marvel-produced fan magazine FOOM (Friend of Ol’ Marvel). He also wrote trade paperbacks such as The Captain Midnight Action Book of Sports, Health and Nutrition and The Mighty Marvel Fun Book number four and five. After leaving Marvel, he freelanced for both Marvel and DC, and his scripts appeared in Captain Marvel, Master of Kung Fu, Omega the Unknown, Time Warp, House of Mystery, Weird War Tales, Welcome Back, Kotter and others.

His first novel, The Gift, was a finalist for a Lambda Literary Award in the category of Best Gay SF/Fantasy Novel. His writing for television includes Saturday morning cartoon work for Hanna Barbera and treatments for the syndicated TV show Tales from the Darkside (the episodes “Fear of Floating,” “Baker’s Dozen” and “My Ghost Writer, the Vampire”). His book reviews have appeared in The Washington Post, The New York Review of Science Fiction, and Science Fiction and Fantasy Book Review.

An awesome bio! Here’s the interview:

Poseidon’s Scribe: How did you get started writing? What prompted you?

Scott Edelman: The earliest writing I can remember doing—back when I was only in the single digits, probably around the 3rd Grade—were prose stories of comic book characters who hadn’t yet met in the pages of the comics themselves, but who I very much wished would get together. I scribbled out long, complicated encounters between all the Marvel and DC characters—something which wouldn’t happen in the real life world for several decades. So it was a case of writing the stories I wish had already been written by others, but since they hadn’t yet done it, I had to do it myself. And once I’d done that, I learned I enjoyed telling stories.

But the first story I ever wrote and submitted professionally came about after I’d read a few of Robert E. Howard’s Conan stories, and with the ego of youth, thought, “Hey, I can do that!” So at age 16, I wrote what would be my first story every written with the goal of publication. It was about a barbarian warrior on a quest, was sent off to The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, from which it was rejected in three days.

And several thousand rejections (I stopped counting after my first 1,000) and 113 short story sales later, here I still am.

P.S.: I’m sure people are fascinated that you worked at Marvel Comics. Please describe what that was like, and your advice for writers thinking of working in comics today.

S.E.: I have no useful advice whatsoever for writers thinking of working in comics today. I wouldn’t even have had advice for writers who hoped to work in comics at the same time I did, which was in 1974, 48 years ago. That’s because it all happened by accident! Serendipity has always been my friend.

I’d never intended to work in comics. I’d always thought I’d be a journalist, and hopefully become a three-day-a-week newspaper columnist in the Pete Hamill or Jimmy Breslin vein, names which probably mean little to contemporary readers. I was a comics fan who, living in Brooklyn as I did, was able to become friends with the professional writers, editors, and artists who worked at Marvel and DC through the convention circuit,  but I wanted nothing from them. I wasn’t on the make for freelance assignments or a staff job. But then one came looking for me.

A comics fan named Duffy Vohland who’d moved to New York to begin working for Marvel rented an apartment in my neighborhood, and as he was unloading his possessions, some local kids saw his boxes of comics, and told him there was another guy only a few blocks away who also collected comics—me. So one day, he showed up at my door, we became friends, one thing led to another, and when a job opening happened at Marvel Comics, I was asked to apply.

So I got my job because a) I was born in Brooklyn b) started attending comic book conventions when they were small c) developed friendships with creators d) had someone move into my neighborhood e) was offered a job…and several other steps which no one could possibly replicate. How to do it today? No idea!

As for what it was like…it was a job which didn’t feel like a job, and from which none of us ever wanted to go home. Imagine the Dick Van Dyke Show, except about comics. No one ever wanted to leave, because we were living in a dream, and didn’t want to wake up. In the evenings we’d go to restaurants and movies together, or play poker, and on the weekends, we’d get together for volleyball and BBQ. There was no separation between work and the wider community of comics professionals of the ‘70s. It was the most creative group of people I’ve ever worked with. It was a family.

And eventually it became more than a family, because that’s where I found my wife, with whom this year I’ll celebrate my 46th anniversary.

P.S.: In what ways, if any, did your start in the comic book industry shape your later fiction writing?

S.E.: What I took away from my time in comics were lessons about what I didn’t want my prose fiction career to be like.

To begin with, it had multiple negative effects. First, I found it difficult to write what I wanted to write, vs. what others wanted me to write. It’s hard to turn down writing assignments when you know whatever you hand in on a Friday you’ll be paid for the following Wednesday. So I was writing not just comics, but letter columns, house ads, etc., doing those rather than my own writing. I shut down my muse during those years. I was the embodiment of what George Bernard Shaw meant when he wrote: “If you want to be a writer, you must have money, otherwise people will throw money at your head to buy your talent to use it and distort it for their own frivolous purpose.” A dreadful warning!

But in addition to stealing my time, comics also affected my style. I noticed the writing I did manage to find time to write for myself began to sound more and more like Stan Lee’s Bullpen Bulletins prose. Bombastic. Alliterative. His style had seeped into my subconscious and I was unable to control my word choices.

But remember—I was only age 19 when I started in comics, not yet mature enough to keep the walls separated between the writing I did for myself and the writing I did for others. Later on, during my years editing Science Fiction Age and working for the Syfy Channel, I was able to maintain that separation, But back then, I knew the only way I’d get back to my own fiction again, written my own way, was to leave. And so began a series of non-creative jobs so I could protect what I considered the most important.

That’s not to say I didn’t love my time there. But I probably loved comics too much for my own good, and would probably have been better off remaining a fan than becoming part of the industry.

P.S.: Who are the three main people who influenced your writing? What are three of your favorite books?

S.E.: My answer would differ depending on when you asked me that question. When I was a kid, I’d say Isaac Asimov, Robert A. Heinlein, and Arthur C. Clarke. As a teen, my triumvirate was instead Harlan Ellison, Samuel R. Delany, and Roger Zelazny. Next came Italo Calvino, Raymond Carver, and James Tiptree, Jr. (that is, Alice Sheldon).

But influence doesn’t end just because we’re no longer at the beginning. I continue to be influenced by my peers. So I take from writers such as (to name just a few) Sarah Pinsker, P. Djèlí Clark, Meg Elison, Fonda Lee, Andy Duncan, Sam J. Miller, Amal El-Mohtar, Victor LaValle, Alyssa Wong, Sam J. Miller…I could go on.  They are as much an inspiration as any of those I encountered when I was starting. It’s important to continue to read widely, and to leave ourselves open to the future as well as the past.

As for my favorite books, I’d prefer to share three short stories I return to and reread year after year, because they still amaze me—

“Day Million,” by Frederick Pohl

“What We Talk About When We Talk About Love,” by Raymond Carver

“The Women Men Don’t See” by James Tiptree, Jr.

P.S.: You’ve written for, and in, so many mediums—short stories, novels, poems, comic books, television, podcasting, etc.—which is your favorite, and why?

S.E.: It will now and forever be the short story. I am a minimalist, and my sweet spot when writing is 5,000-7,000 words. I prefer to create stories which can be consumed in a single sitting, so the whole of it can be contained in one’s head at once. I feel no need to fill in the entire background history of a character, or what happens next once the story is over, or to follow every untold side tangent which might arise. The only novel I’ve ever published was originally a short story, but it got away from me in rewrites, and I find the chances of that repeating as highly unlikely. I’ve heard it said that a short story is the most important moment in a person’s life, after which they are changed forever, or conversely, decide they’ll never change. Those are the moments I always wish to explore.

P.S.: Is there a common attribute that ties your fiction together (genre, character types, settings, themes) or are you a more eclectic author?

S.E.: If you look past genre, the common attribute is love. Theodore Sturgeon once said all of his stories were actually love stories, and I think anyone who reads widely in my published fiction—and I just placed my 113th story last week—will see that as my most predominant theme, though there are others.

But in terms of form and genre, I am indeed eclectic. The opening line of my entry in the Science Fiction Encyclopedia reads: “US editor and author, his fiction having had perhaps unduly little recognition, almost certainly because his work shifts from horror to fantasy to SF without any marketing consistency.” I wear that description as a badge of honor! I will always use any metaphorical tools to tell the stories I want to tell.

P.S.: Much of your writing leans to the horror side. What fascinates you about that genre?

S.E.: Your question made me curious about the true extent of my relationship with horror, so I ran down my list of 113 published (and about to be published) stories and discovered the breakdown is—

  • 43% horror
  • 34 % science fiction
  • 20% fantasy
  • 3% metafictional/unclassifiable

Which I thought intriguing…but unsurprising.

But those percentages shift if I categorize only the most recent 25 stories, though—

  • 48% science fiction
  • 30% fantasy
  • 22% horror

So over the past five years, I was still writing horror… just not as high a percentage of my output as before. The only explanation I can imagine for that shift is—the horror of the 2016 election and what came after was enough for me, and for that period of time, I didn’t feel felt like dwelling there. But I imagine that shift is only temporary.

As for why I love horror…it provides me with an amazing toolbox of metaphors with which to speak of our true fears—the fear of aging, the fear of loneliness, the fear of loss of agency, the fear of loss of self. Wrapping those fears in zombies, ghosts, vampires and the less traditional horrors makes them more terrifying…and more poignant.

Though sometimes, of course, it isn’t about the metaphors, and zombies are just cool!

P.S.: What are the easiest, and the most difficult, aspects of writing for you?

S.E.: The most difficult aspect of writing for me is my writing method itself, as I have learned my best work only comes when I scribble my first drafts longhand, and then edit them the same way. I’ve tried to compose at a keyboard, but when I do, either nothing comes, or if it does, its either clumsy or facile. So I write with pen and paper, then key it into a computer, and print it out to do edits and revisions…which I then key in, print out, and do the same over and over again.

And another thing that’s difficult for me, I guess—though I don’t think of it as difficult, just slow—is that I can’t begin a day’s writing without rereading all words on a particular work up to that point. So if I left off in the middle of page 10, I must the next day slowly reread all that went before, rebuilding the house of cards in my head. And if it’s a novella, I must reread dozens of pages. I can never jump right in.

As for the easiest? I will never run out of ideas! I usually get 3-4 new ones for each one I write, so I will never catch up during this or any other lifetime. I am grateful for my subconscious, which collaborates with me that way.

P.S.: I was pleased to participate in your unique podcast, “Eating the Fantastic.” Tell us about that podcast series—how it started and what listeners can learn from it.

S.E.: I’d been a guest on many podcasts in my life, but it wasn’t until I appeared on The Horror Show with Brian Keene podcast during its first year that I thought—hey, I can do that! I love talking to people, love finding out their secret origins and how they do what they do. But I knew there were dozens, if not hundreds, of interview shows out there. How to differentiate mine from all the others? What would be my niche? I decided to marry my love of food and love of people into a single podcast—but one which was about the people more than the food.

My love of tracking down good food while traveling the world attending conventions was so well known one blogger dubbed me “science fiction’s Anthony Bourdain.” And since the con away from the con—which takes place when I wander off-site with friends for a meal—can often be more fun than the con itself, I decided to replicate that good conversation with good friends over good food for listeners.

I believe food relaxes my guests, loosens their tongues, distracts them from the interview process so they sometimes forget they’re even recording, and as a result, gives listeners a more intimate picture of them than any studio podcast where the guests is always aware they’re “on.”

As for what listeners can learn from it—across the nearly 300 hours so far, they’ll hear from nearly 250 writers, editors, and agents about both the art and craft of writing. They’ll feel they’re at the table with us, learning as I learn how they create the fiction of the fantastic we love.

P.S.: Tell us about Things That Never Happened. How did that book, and its interesting cover, happen?

S.E.: I wish there was some fascinating backstory I could tell you about why and how my most recent collection came to exist, but it’s merely that I had reached critical mass of a certain type of story—dark fantasies of the Twilight Zone-ish type—and so began looking for publisher willing to join me on the project. That’s often the way collections occur for me—when looking back at the mass of stories in my wake—currently 113 of them—and seeing such similarities. Luckily, Norm Prentiss of Cemetery Dance was willing to take me on, and I’m extremely pleased with the result.

As for the cover of Things That Never Happened, I’m so glad I had nothing to do with the creation other than to inspire artist Lynne Hansen with my stories. The covers I’d helped design myself have all been disasters. Which is an important lesson to learn—just because you’re a writer, it doesn’t mean you’re also a cover designer who can help create what’s essentially an advertisement for you book. The ones I had anything to do with I later realized repelled rather than attracted readers. Those mistakes were how I learned to stay out of cover design other than to say “thank you very much” when others do great work.

P.S.: What is your current work in progress? Would you mind telling us a little about it?

S.E.: I dislike talking about my stories in progress—not just until after I’ve finishing writing them—but also not until they’re sold and published. But I will say this much—

I earlier today completed the first draft of a new fantasy story which came in at around 4,200 words—and for which the ending I decided necessary is, I fear, almost impossible to pull off. But I’ve always felt that if I’m not always attempting to do something I think can’t be done, what’s the point?

Some believe a writer—or anyone in any field—should stick to their strengths. But I’ve always felt I should stick to my weaknesses. How else will I get better, and level up to the point where one of my facets becomes a strength rather than a weakness? Writing, like anything else, is a muscle, and I can only get better by doing what is hard, what needs improvement.

I’m able to do this, I think, because I recognize my writing life is more about a career than any particular story, which means what attempting to get something right this time around might do, even if I should fail, is equip me for getting it right next time. At least that’s what I hope.

And that’s all I feel comfortable saying about my current story—which still has about 10 working titles. My next step, before diving into draft two, will be to winnow down to the final one, because that will focus me as I move on.

Poseidon’s Scribe: What advice can you offer to aspiring writers?

Scott Edelman: I think I’ve already given some with my previous answer, but the most important advice I can give is to repeat the memorable line from Galaxy Quest: “Never give up! Never surrender!”

The reason I’m still here isn’t because I was any good when I began. It’s because in the face of rejection—the first of which I received at age 16, remember—I never took it personally. I kept writing, I kept submitting—and because inevitably, if one does both of those things—I kept improving.

If you can find find joy in your work, so that the writing can be its own reward, if you can focus on having fun writing the next story rather than worrying about the fate of the last one, you will eventually achieve your goals.

I urge you to find joy in telling the tales you want to tell, the ones only you can tell. I can think of no better life than that.

Thank you very much, Scott. Readers of my blog can find out much more about Scott at his website, or on Twitter, Instagram, or Facebook . Also check out his podcast.

Poseidon’s Scribe

Oh, the Things You’ll Write!

It’s hard to think of a hobby, pastime, or activity more versatile, more location-independent, than writing. You can write almost anywhere. I’ve come up with a poem about that. Sincere apologies, Dr. Seuss:

You can write stuff on a train. You can write stuff on a plane.

You can write stuff in your house. Write beside your dozing spouse.

Write by soft electric light. Write quite late into the night.

You can write until the dawn. You can write out on the lawn.

You can write while in a park. You can write on old tree bark.

You can write both here and there. You can write most anywhere.

You can write while at a desk, from sublime to the grotesque.

Write first hither and then yon, and while sitting on the john

Write in your own living room, in a meeting while on Zoom.

Write while sitting in a chair wearing only underwear.

Write while riding in a car. Write when you get to the bar.

You can write both there and here. Write between big gulps of beer.

You can write while still in school, then while tanning at the pool.

You can write within your dorm. Write through a torrential storm.

You can write your prose so clear, hanging from a chandelier.

Have you written ‘till you cried, halfway up a mountainside?

You can write on any trip, even on a fine cruise ship.

You can write beneath the moon. Write aloft in a balloon.

You could write, or so I’ve heard, high up in a whirlybird.

You can by world unseen, while aboard a submarine.

You can write on your commute. Or hanging from a parachute.

You can write your very best while atop Mount Everest.

Write in far-off Kathmandu, or even while in Timbuktu.

You can write in every place. Even while in outer space.

Write while in a time machine. (Done before you start, I mean.)

You can write in any spot. That’s convenient, is it not?

You can write, (this ain’t no gibe), better than—

Poseidon’s Scribe

6 Tricks to Keep You Writing

Some time ago, you thought of a great idea for a story and started writing. Today, you can’t bring yourself to work on it any more. You’re not feeling the urge. You lost enthusiasm.

As you look back over it, you realize your writing sucks. You can’t bear to go on with it. You’ve come to believe it’s a waste of time.

You’re wondering what happened. How could you have been so fired up about the idea of the story, and so disgusted with the reality of it? Where did all that fervor, that passion, go? How do you get it back?

One option—the easiest one—is to give up. Admit defeat. Abandon the story and do other things with your time. I’ve explored that possibility before. Most often, that’s not the answer. You might be denying the world a good story, a salvageable one.

Maybe, if you search hard enough, or wait long enough, your motivation will return. Nah. As author Chuck Wendig explains in this post, nobody’s going to mail you some motivation, gift you some get-up-and-go, or present you a package of passion.

You have to rekindle that fire inside yourself, by yourself. Sorry. There’s no other way.

I know some techniques for doing that. Maybe one or more of the following will work for you:

  1. Reward. Give yourself small rewards for producing set amounts of writing. Grant yourself the reward only for output, not time spent. Note: food is not an ideal reward.
  2. Deadline. If you’re the type who works best under the pressure of time, create that pressure. Invent a deadline date and make it as real as you can—a visible calendar with the date circled in red. Devise a suitable (painless) penalty for missing the deadline, and a suitable reward for meeting it.
  3. Organize. If writing the story now seems intimidating and overwhelming, break it down into manageable parts. Finishing these small tasks will give you a sense of accomplishment and show progress toward the overall goal.
  4. Re-evaluate. Perhaps you’ve assumed you’d achieve brilliant prose in your first draft. Lower those expectations. Accept that this story might require several pass-throughs, each draft improving the story a little. The world won’t see your sausage-making process, only the final product.
  5. Remember. Think back to the origin of the story. Get back in that frame of mind. Recall why you felt so good about it then. Maybe the story needs some tweaking, some slight adjustments, from your original thoughts.
  6. Envision. Imagine a near future with your story finished, published, and succeeding. However you define ‘success,’ visualize an outsized amount—readers clamoring for your autograph, talk show hosts eager to interview you, vast royalties pouring into your savings account, whatever. Warning—don’t fall so much in love with this fantasy that you set yourself up for disappointment.

One or more of those techniques might help you fall back in love with your story, at least enough to finish writing it.

Take it from someone who’s used all six of those tricks at some point, none other than—

Poseidon’s Scribe

12 Purposes of Food in Stories

Real-life humans (you and me, for example) eat food to convert it to energy and use that to grow and move. Fictional characters get along just fine without food. Why, then, do we often read entire scenes showing characters eating?

On the other hand, many novels and short stories don’t mention food at all. Fictional years and decades may pass without a character consuming even one morsel or drinking one drop. Yet the character doesn’t die of starvation. What’s with that?

Readers assume a character eats ‘off-stage,’ just as we assume characters use the bathroom as needed without the author belaboring the waste expulsion process.

Since readers will assume a character eats, that takes us back to our original question—why do authors sometimes describe a character eating? I’ve come up with a dozen reasons, though there may be more:

  1. Setting. Food represents part of the setting in which the characters speak and interact. An author’s description of food helps the reader picture the location and background. Depending on the author’s intent, the food may complement the rest of the setting or provide a counterpoint to it.
  2. Authenticity. Some stories feature food as a central part of the story, and the author must show the character eating for the sake of realism. It would seem weird if the character didn’t eat. 
  3. Mood. The author can use food to show mood. (Apparently that’s true for poets, too.) A character’s opinion about food clues the reader into the character’s state of mind. That mood might not match the character’s out-loud dialogue, but will reveal the character’s true emotions.
  4. Talent. The preparation of food, especially difficult or dangerous types of prep, can showcase a character’s talent. Even an odd method of eating food (such as tossing candy in the air and catching it in the mouth) can demonstrate a talent useful to the story.
  5. Status. The type of food a character eats or prepares, whether hobo stew or truffles, may indicate the character’s status or wealth in the society. An author may also flip that script for an amusing or shocking contrast.
  6. Personality. Discussion about food, or the manner in which a character eats food, can unveil a character’s personality traits. Does the character slurp soup, season food before tasting, eat all the carrots before touching the potatoes, chew very slowly, slice the meat into many pieces before consuming one, etc.? How a character deals with food tells readers about the character’s general behavior patterns.
  7. Thoughts. Delicious food often reduces inhibitions, prompting people to say what they really think. This is particularly true as characters imbibe alcohol.
  8. Dialogue. People talk while eating, and a shared meal gives characters a chance to converse. This dialogue, like all fictional dialogue, must serve a purpose. It must reveal something about a character or must advance the plot, or both.
  9. Prop. The mechanics of food and drink consumption—sniffing, licking lips, arranging a napkin, cutting, lifting to the mouth, blowing to cool hot food, chewing, savoring, swallowing, etc.—help break up dialogue with action. A character may use an eating utensil to illustrate or emphasize a point.   
  10. Relaxation. A quiet meal can serve as a low-tension scene separating two high-action scenes. It gives the reader a chance to catch a breath while characters catch a bite.
  11. Conflict. A meal may afford the opportunity for characters to confront each other over a disagreement. They may argue, or even fight.
  12. Symbolism. An author may use any type of food or drink to symbolize something else. If a character keeps coming back to a particular type of food, and it’s either described or consumed in a different way each time, chances are it symbolizes some aspect of a change in the character.

Unlike us, fictional characters don’t need food to survive, but a story might require a character to eat anyway.

Don’t know about you, but this discussion of food has made me hungry. It’s off to the kitchen for—

Poseidon’s Scribe

Eating the Fantastic, with Scott Edelman

Earlier this month, I had the honor of being interviewed by author Scott Edelman (Wikipedia page here).

The author, about to talk with his mouth full for 1.5 hours

We’d met a few years ago at Balticon, the Baltimore Science Fiction convention, and served on a couple of discussion panels together. For several years now, he’s been interviewing scifi authors for a podcast series he calls ‘Eating the Fantastic.’

While attending cons, Scott enjoyed eating meals with other authors and discussing science fiction. He soon realized he didn’t need to wait for cons to do that, so started his unique podcast series and has interviewed over 170 authors so far.

We met at the Bonnie Blue Southern Market and Bakery in Winchester, Virginia on May 3rd. A nice day, so we ate outside at one of their patio tables. After conducting so many of these interviews, Scott knew just how to make me feel at ease, and I forgot about the microphone and just answered his questions the best I could.

Most authors enjoy talking about their writing, and I’m no different. Ask any author that, and you’ll see. Before you do, though, clear your schedule for the next few hours.

My conversation with Scott ranged over many topics, and I struggled for answers at times, but overall, he’s a wonderful interviewer. My breakfast at Bonnie Blue tasted delicious. The restaurant staff provided professional and friendly service.

As you listen to the podcast, you’ll hear my views on:

  • the pandemic’s effect on writing;
  • SciFi conventions, including my experiences as panelist and moderator;
  • how I started writing;
  • my early influences, including Verne, Asimov, Heinlein, Clarke, and Bradbury;
  • my own writing career and writing style;
  • my short stories;
  • Alternate History, and the research necessary to write in that subgenre;
  • the Snowflake Method* of writing;
  • writing for themed anthologies;
  • responding to editors who request story changes;
  • co-editing 20,000 Leagues Remembered
  • the depiction of submarines in books and movies; and
  • my current Work in Progress, and beyond.

* During the interview, I mispronounced Dr. Randy Ingermanson’s last name. My apologies to him. He’s the inventor of the Snowflake Method for writing novels. I use an abbreviated form of that method to write short stories.

Many thanks to Scott Edelman. Being interviewed by him for ‘Eating the Fantastic’ was a distinct honor for—

Poseidon’s Scribe

Break Any Rule but This One

Are you one of those who’d like to write a story—a novel, even—but the task seems too difficult? You recall unpleasant memories of Language Arts classes, learning all the complex rules of English. You’re afraid you’ll break a rule.

I’ll simplify things for you. There’s only one rule.

There exist, however, a vast number of guidelines. These cover spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence structure, plot, pacing, character development, story formatting, manuscript submitting, and more. A lot to keep track of.

Or not.

For every guideline you name, at least one famous author ignored it:

  • Don’t use double negatives. Jane Austen didn’t not use them.
  • Don’t use run-on sentences. Both Charles Dickens and Marcel Proust thought otherwise, going on and on with long sentences on many occasions, long past the point of necessity.
  • Don’t begin sentences with conjunctions. But William Faulkner did.
  • Always set off dialogue with quotation marks. Cormac McCarthy and José Saramago said no thanks.
  • Use periods and commas where required. James Joyce and Gertrude Stein both famous writers got along okay without them
  • Use proper punctuation. Samuel Beckett never did and Junot Díaz never does

How come you had to learn all those guidelines, but famous authors get to violate them? For one thing, guidelines help when you’re learning to write. Also, the guidelines make your writing more understandable to readers. They’re getting what they expect, what they find easy to read.

It’s okay to violate a guideline, but you shouldn’t break the One Rule.

What’s the One Rule?

Here it is: Tell a good story.

That’s it. Or rather, that’s the simplest expression of the One Rule.

What is a ‘good story?’ From a writer’s perspective, I’d say a good story comes from deep within. The writer cares about the story and feels a strong need to tell it.

If the writer does that job well enough, then a good story (1) draws a reader in, (2) keeps a reader reading, (3) leaves a reader changed, and (4) lingers in the reader’s mind long after reading it.

If you write a good story, it doesn’t matter how many guidelines you violate.

Let’s say you’re in the middle of writing a story. Words are flowing, straight from your heart. You’re in the zone.

You stop. Some inner editor, some memory of a Language Arts teacher, or some recollection of an authoritative website’s advice, berates you for breaking a rule. Looking back over your manuscript in horror, you realize it’s true. You’re a language criminal. The linguistic police will apprehend you and send you to writer jail.

Before the law can close in, you hide the evidence. You change the story, bringing it into compliance with the rules. From somewhere inside, a rebel voice protests, “now you’re making the story worse.”

As you look over what you’ve edited, it’s clear. The voice is right. The story is worse. Not what it was meant to be. As if the story itself wants you to break a rule. Your story demands it.

What to do? Well, many things that seem like hard and fast rules are really just guidelines. If obeying them would worsen your story, ignore them.

That last part—that ‘if’—is key. Violate a guideline only after consideration, not out of ignorance.

Just don’t break the One Rule. Tell a good story. In the pursuit of that goal, you may violate any other guideline, with the full permission of—

Poseidon’s Scribe