Author Interview—Joseph S. Walker

Readers will recall that the anthology Extraordinary Visions: Stories Inspired by Jules Verne came out in December. I’ve offered to interview authors of stories in that volume, and some have accepted. Today I bring you the first of those.

Joseph S. Walker’s short fiction has been published in Alfred Hitchcock’s Mystery Magazine, Ellery Queen’s Mystery Magazine, Mystery Weekly, Tough, and many other magazines and anthologies.  His story “Crime Scene” is included in the 2023 editions of both The Best American Mystery and Suspense and The Mysterious Bookshop Presents the Best Mystery Stories of the Year (marking his third consecutive appearance in this collection). He has been nominated for the Edgar Award and the Derringer Award and has won the Bill Crider Prize for Short Fiction. He also won the Al Blanchard Award in 2019 and 2021.

Here’s the interview:

Poseidon’s Scribe: How did you get started writing fiction? What prompted you? 

Joseph S. Walker: I wanted to write fiction from a very young age.  It was in large part because of that desire that I majored in English, eventually getting a PhD in American Literature.  In retrospect, though, this may have been a mistake, at least for me.  Studying literature in such a rigorous way made actually writing fiction seem like an overwhelming prospect.  Then, too, it has a tendency to make you feel like you should be aiming at mainstream or literary fiction, or whatever label you want to put on it.  There’s been progress on that front, but genre writing is still treated as something of a second-tier arena in much of the academy.  So for years I told myself I was a writer, but my time was mostly spent on academic articles, and a few rather dour, realistic stories I labored over for years.

It wasn’t until my 40s that I decided that if I wanted to be a writer, at some point I had to actually write something.  I also decided that it didn’t have to be agonizing.  It could be fun.  It should be fun.  I started writing things that I enjoyed writing, in the fields (mostly mystery and crime) that I enjoyed reading.  One of the first stories I wrote with this mindset was accepted to Alfred Hitchcock’s Mystery Magazine, and from that point on all I wanted to do was write.  I’m published more than eighty short stories now, and I just want to keep going.

P.S.: Who are some of your influences? What are a few of your favorite books? 

J.S.W.: In terms of the actual style of my writing, I think the biggest influence would be Robert B. Parker, who created the private eye Spenser.  I look at some of my earlier stories now, and it’s almost like I’m writing a pastiche of one of his Spenser novels.  I think I’ve come a way in developing my own voice, but the echoes are still there.  That said, the writer who made me want to be a writer was Harlan Ellison.  He’s usually classified as a science fiction writer, though he also wrote a large number of crime stories.  I loved his writing, and his essays especially have stayed with me.  He made being a writer seem like a privilege, an honor, an obligation, and a lot of fun.

A few favorite books off the top of my head: Strange Wine (Harlan Ellison); When the Sacred Ginmill Closes (Lawrence Block); Lincoln in the Bardo (George Saunders); Possession (A. S. Byatt); A Catskill Eagle (Robert B. Parker); Last Chance to See (Douglas Adams); I’ll Be Gone in the Dark (Michelle McNamera); Devil in a Blue Dress (Walter Mosley)

P.S.: Your short stories tend to be about crime and mystery. What attracted you to these genres?

J.S.W.: Partly, it’s just the fact that it’s the genre I’ve always loved reading.  I think my early reading history is shared with many of my fellow mystery writers: the Hardy Boys and the Three Investigators, then on to Doyle and Christie, then Hammett and Chandler, and so on up to Gillian Flynn and S. A. Cosby.  And then, writing stories like this is fun for me.  Starting a new story is always hard, but if you’re lucky there comes a moment when something clicks and the words seem to tumble onto the page.  For me, that happens most often when I’m writing crime.

P.S.: You’ve got a story appearing in The Best American Mystery and Suspense, coming out in October. Please give us a hint about what to expect in this story.

J.S.W.: The story is question is “Crime Scene,” which originally appeared in Malice in Dallas, an anthology from the North Dallas chapter of Sisters in Crime.  In my story, a semi-retired assassin takes an assignment to kill a prominent businessman, but the job has to be done in Dealey Plaza, on November 22, at a ceremony marking the anniversary of the Kennedy assassination.  The story was my response to seeing Dealey Plaza in person for the first time, and being struck by how different it seemed from every picture of the area I’d ever seen.

Having the story selected for The Best American Mystery and Suspense (by series editor Steph Cha and guest editor Lisa Unger) is a true honor, especially since I’ve been faithfully buying every volume of this series since it was launched, as Best American Mystery Stories, back in the 1980s.  As it happens, “Crime Scene” was also selected for the upcoming volume of the other annual best-of anthology in my field, The Mysterious Bookshop Presents the Best Mystery Stories of the Year (series editor Otto Penzler, guest editor Amor Towles).  To the best of my knowledge, it’s the first story to be selected for both series!

P.S.: In what ways are your stories different from those of other crime and mystery fiction authors? 

J.S.W.: This is probably a question which others are better suited to answer.  I don’t know that writers are necessarily the best judges of their own work.  That said, I think if there’s anything that distinguishes many of my stories, it would be an underlying concern with isolation and loneliness.  My characters tend to be desperate people who can perhaps be saved if they can forge one genuine relationship with another person.

P.S.: Congratulations on winning the newly-instituted Bill Crider Prize for Short Fiction. Tell us about your story “The Last Man in Lafarge,” and about the experience of winning the award.

J.S.W.: The Bill Crider Prize was given for the first time at the 2019 Bouchercon, held in Dallas.  I was very proud to win the award, especially since the contest was judged by Linda Landrigan and Janet Hutchings, the editors of, respectively, Alfred Hitchcock’s Mystery Magazine and Ellery Queen’s Mystery Magazine.  At the time, there very much seemed to be a plan that the award would be given every year in honor of Mr. Crider, a prolific and skilled mystery writer.  Unfortunately, in subsequent years this plan seems to have fallen by the wayside, perhaps in part because of the pandemic, which caused the 2020 and 2021 Bouchercons to be held in reduced form online.  It’s possible I will go down as the only winner of the Crider Prize, but I very much hope the award does return.

Winning the award meant I got to attend my first Bouchercon, where I got to rub elbows with many of my favorite writers, meet some heroes, and make a lot of new friends.  I left feeling determined to attend every year, not knowing that the next in-person convention wouldn’t be until three years later in Minneapolis.

As for “The Last Man in Lafarge,” it remains one of my favorites among my stories.  It’s about a sheriff in a dying Texas town, a bartender with a mysterious past, and a prodigal son with the kind of secret that can get a person killed.

P.S.: You’ve won the Al Blanchard award for best New England-based crime stories twice! Once for your story, “Haven,” and later for your story “Herb Ecks Goes Underground.” What were those experiences like?

J.S.W.: Deeply gratifying!  In 2021, a week after going to Dallas for Bouchercon, I got to go to Boston to attend the New England Crime Bake, a much smaller and more intimate mystery convention, to collect this award.  Once again I had a fantastic time, and the experience only deepened my sense of having found my community among my fellow mystery writers.  Unfortunately I wasn’t able to attend when I won the prize again in 2023, but it’s a wonderful contest, and I intend to keep entering every year.

P.S.: What are the easiest, and the most difficult, aspects of writing for you?

J.S.W.: The most difficult part, for me, is always actually starting.  That applies to both starting a completely new story, and simply sitting down to start a writing session.  Sitting at a computer with internet access, I can find 5000 ways to procrastinate before I actually manage to force myself to put something on the page.  Once over that initial hump, things get—well, I won’t say easy, because it’s never easy.  But easier.

As I say, no part of the process is easy.  If there’s an area where I feel least like I’m fighting my way uphill, it’s probably writing dialogue.  I just find that to be enjoyable, though I often get carried away and have to cut back on it in revision.

P.S.: Tell us a little about your story, “The Dominion of All the Earth,” in the Extraordinary Visions anthology. Do you consider it a departure from your usual story type, or a typical representative of it?

J.S.W.: “The Dominion of All the Earth” is very much a departure from my usual writing, which is a big part of the reason I was interested when I saw the call for stories.  I like to occasionally challenge myself to do something that isn’t a crime story set in the present day.  Seeing the call also gave me a strong sense of nostalgia, because I read and greatly enjoyed many of Verne’s novels in my youth.  I figured there was a good chance that many, if not most, of the submitted stories would take 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea as their starting point, since Nemo is such a fascinating figure.  That meant it would probably be a good idea to use a different Verne work, and I remembered that my other favorite was A Journey to the Center of the Earth.  I reread the book, for the first time in decades, and thought there was a story to be told about how the subterranean world would absorb, and ultimately respond to, the damage done by the explorers from the surface world.  In my story, it’s been fifty years since the excursion underground, and the response is finally coming.

P.S.: What is your current work in progress? Would you mind telling us a little about it?

J.S.W.: I write exclusively short stories (at least so far!), so what I’m working on changes very often.  This is actually a big part of what I like about writing short stories.  Instead of spending months, if not years, on a single narrative—and then waiting more years for publication—I can be working on something new virtually every week.  If I write a story that’s too dark, I can follow it up with one that’s mostly humorous.  Right at this moment, for example, I’m working on a story for a hardboiled anthology of 20s private eye stories, but I’m already sketching out an idea for a farcical heist story with a holiday theme.

I can say that I have some stories coming this year that I’m very proud of!

Poseidon’s Scribe: What advice can you offer aspiring writers?

Joseph S. Walker: It may sound simplistic, but the best advice is the simplest: write.  I started being a productive writer the moment I stopped thinking about how great it would be to be a writer, and started actually writing.  Put your ass in the chair and your fingers on the keys.  Keep in mind that the real writing happens in the process of revision.  I find this realization tremendously liberating.  It means that I can throw virtually anything down on the page, knowing I’ll have the chance to come back later and work on it more.  It gives me the freedom to be terrible, which liberates me from the burden of aiming for great.

Thanks, Joe.

Readers wanting more information about Joseph S. Walker can visit his website and follow him on Twitter and Amazon.

Jack the Ripper

Late in the year 1888, someone terrorized the slums of East London’s Whitechapel district, murdering at least five women. Before the slayings stopped, a newspaper received a letter signed by ‘Jack the Ripper,’ and that chilling moniker haunts us still, more than a century later. The cases have never been solved.

RippersRing72dpiJack the Ripper appears as a character in an upcoming story of mine, “Ripper’s Ring,” which will launch in early May and will be available here. After reading the story, you’ll understand how the Ripper got away with the crimes, and how a single detective at Scotland Yard really solved the case. Well, one fictional theory, anyway.

Hasn’t JtR been used in fiction before, you ask? Yes, in tales by the following authors, at least: Peter Ackroyd, Carla E. Anderton, John Brooks Barry, Robert Bloch, Anthony Boucher, Fredric Brown, Harlan Ellison, Philip José Farmer, Lyndsay Faye, Gardner Fox, Michael Generali, David L. Golemon, Richard Gordon, T. E. Huff, Richard Laymon, Kim Newman, Anne Perry, Robert Perry and Mike Tucker, Stefan Petrucha, Ray Russell, Iain Sinclair, and Roger Zelazny.

Obviously, JtR is a character too compelling for writers to resist. When you combine the horrific acts, the fear they induce in a community, the anonymity, and the timeless nickname, you get a powerful character suitable for unlimited fictional variations.

As you’ll read about in upcoming blog posts, my take on the Ripper is—I believe—unique. Since the story is part of the What Man Hath Wrought series, you know it has to involve technology, and the difficulty of coping with it. This story might even make you think.

“Ripper’s Ring” is darker than the other stories in the series, but is also a mystery/detective story, and a thoughtful tale about power and restraint. Soon it will be released on an unsuspecting public, not just in Whitechapel, but worldwide. It’s well worth the wait, according to—

Poseidon’s Scribe

A Mystery to Me

Do you love reading mysteries?  Ever think of writing one?

The genre was invented by Edgar Allan Poe and popularized by Arthur Conan Doyle in his Sherlock Holmes stories.  It remains a popular genre with a devoted readership.

The mystery genre is hard to define.  All fiction involves an element of mystery, since there’s always a conflict and the reader doesn’t know how the protagonist will resolve that conflict.  Here we’ll speak of stories where the focus is on the puzzling aspects of the conflict, which is often a crime or some unexplained phenomena.  In addition, the sleuth in the story uses attention to detail and deductive logic to solve the mystery.

In your mystery story, make sure the mystery itself is something important, something the reader will care about.  That’s why there are so many murder mysteries, and so few involving a missing 99¢ comb.

Before writing your story, develop various timelines or storylines:

1.  First is the actual timeline of events in which the real perpetrator commits the act.  This must be logical and in accordance with various character’s motivations.  As author, you’ll be the only one who knows this one.

2.a., 2.b, 2.c, etc.  You may need a series of fake timelines, in each of which one of the other suspects could commit the act.  These need not be completely logical or reflect character motivations exactly, but at first your sleuth won’t know that.

3.  A timeline pieced together by your sleuth, formed through evidence and logical deduction.

4.  You might even have a separate timeline that is revealed to the reader.  However, Timeline 4 usually matches Timeline 3.

Most mysteries involve the commission of a crime.  To do so, a criminal must have means, motive, and opportunity (MMO).  The challenge for the sleuth is that either (1) several people seem to have all three, or (2) nobody seems to have all three.  Of the three necessary parts of MMO, motive is often the first part presented to the reader.

Among frequent readers of the genre it’s considered unfair to (1) withhold evidence from the reader that the sleuth knows, including specialized skills or knowledge, or (2) have the sleuth confront the guilty suspect with insufficient evidence (that wouldn’t gain a conviction in court) but still the criminal breaks down and confesses.

Your writing challenge is to present the reader with all the evidence needed to solve the mystery, but to make the puzzle difficult enough that the reader would rather just read to the end to see how the sleuth cracks the case.  Bear in mind the necessary evidence need not be emphasized in your story, just present.  It could be buried in the middle of a paragraph.  Or you could distract the reader’s attention with some dramatic action that happens to include a piece of evidence easy to gloss over.

The genre has been so well explored, it’s difficult to think of mysteries that haven’t been done.  For example, I wish you luck in thinking up a new version of the locked-room mystery, where a crime is committed in a sealed enclosure where the only entries are locked from the inside.

For that reason, writers of mysteries these days seem to be focusing on the character of the sleuth, or the setting.  In today’s market, the way to set your mystery apart is to have a very compelling sleuth.  The minimum attributes for this character are: (1) attention to detail, and (2) an ability to deduce a chain of events from disparate facts.  Or you could have two sleuths working together, each of which has one of these traits.

Another way to distinguish your mysteries from others is to use a historical or unusual setting.  Depending on how far back a time you choose, it could present a real challenge for your sleuth due to the lack of modern crime investigation technologies.

Did this blog entry inspire you to write a mystery story?  Leave me a comment and let me know about it.  Just make sure the answer to whodunit isn’t–

                                                        Poseidon’s Scribe